Comments on: amBXLib http://grazz.com Building Better Worlds Fri, 06 Aug 2010 10:44:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Robert http://grazz.com/projects/ambxlib/comment-page-1/#comment-263 Robert Fri, 05 Feb 2010 08:57:55 +0000 http://grazz.com/?page_id=240#comment-263 I actually didn't try the basic interop functionality in .NET, but I think that should work. amBX was written in C++/CLI because of my earlier experiences with DirectShow and .NET. I like the syntax and 'cleanliness' of integration :) I actually didn't try the basic interop functionality in .NET, but I think that should work. amBX was written in C++/CLI because of my earlier experiences with DirectShow and .NET. I like the syntax and 'cleanliness' of integration :)

]]> By: Robert http://grazz.com/projects/ambxlib/comment-page-1/#comment-262 Robert Fri, 05 Feb 2010 08:56:13 +0000 http://grazz.com/?page_id=240#comment-262 Yes, that is exactly right (although VB has been a while for me). Don't forget to call AMBX.Dispose() at the end of your program! :) Yes, that is exactly right (although VB has been a while for me). Don't forget to call AMBX.Dispose() at the end of your program! :)

]]> By: Darin http://grazz.com/projects/ambxlib/comment-page-1/#comment-256 Darin Sat, 30 Jan 2010 04:51:31 +0000 http://grazz.com/?page_id=240#comment-256 Hi I was just wondering if you ever had a chance to put together a sample showing the use of your lib. I'm having a prob instantiating an AMBX object from VB.net. It's acting like I don't have some runtime component set right, but the exception is pretty much empty. Not much to go on. I'm just setting it up like so: Private AMBX As amBX = New amBXLib.amBX(1, 0, "Test App", "1.0.0") Does that look right? Thanks And very cool idea. Hi

I was just wondering if you ever had a chance to put together a sample showing the use of your lib. I'm having a prob instantiating an AMBX object from VB.net. It's acting like I don't have some runtime component set right, but the exception is pretty much empty. Not much to go on.

I'm just setting it up like so:

Private AMBX As amBX = New amBXLib.amBX(1, 0, "Test App", "1.0.0")

Does that look right?

Thanks
And very cool idea.

]]> By: Darin http://grazz.com/projects/ambxlib/comment-page-1/#comment-218 Darin Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:55:26 +0000 http://grazz.com/?page_id=240#comment-218 Wow. Just picked up an ambx and was getting prepped to do this exact same thing! Just looking over the code, I never realized you could make actual .net assemblies in C++. Pretty slick. I'm guessing it's not possible to do the same thing via managed code because of the core ambx interfaces being C based? Or was it just easier this way, since you'd already have all the headers etc in .h files? Regardless, thanks for making this available! Wow. Just picked up an ambx and was getting prepped to do this exact same thing!

Just looking over the code, I never realized you could make actual .net assemblies in C++. Pretty slick.

I'm guessing it's not possible to do the same thing via managed code because of the core ambx interfaces being C based? Or was it just easier this way, since you'd already have all the headers etc in .h files?

Regardless, thanks for making this available!

]]> By: Robert http://grazz.com/projects/ambxlib/comment-page-1/#comment-211 Robert Sun, 27 Dec 2009 10:20:18 +0000 http://grazz.com/?page_id=240#comment-211 It certainly is. Any .NET language should be able to use the library. It certainly is. Any .NET language should be able to use the library.

]]> By: svelde http://grazz.com/projects/ambxlib/comment-page-1/#comment-189 svelde Sat, 12 Dec 2009 15:28:52 +0000 http://grazz.com/?page_id=240#comment-189 Interesting. Is it also usable for c#? Interesting. Is it also usable for c#?

]]>